VCSY-Chat-v1

How much would you think that a company could be worth,
that allows people to interconnect Microsoft, LG, Hewlett-Packard and Samsung as one database?

This diagram shows a comparison between a generic traditional software industry construction method and the method described in VCSY's patent 6826744. cc In a traditional world, the content and format are handled by designers whose work is then passed on to a programmer who develops the functionality to package the content, format into an application. These workers have the skills necessary to address parameter/sequence dependencies in these components. Any change required in any of the content, format and/or function must be reworked by the designer and developer to target a different applications space (virtual or metal).
In a VCSY world, content, format and function are stored as objects which may be used in an arbitrary fashion, meaning any object may be used with any other object. A Subject Matter Expert (SME) performs the design and develop tasks without having to learn the implementation requirements necessary in the traditional paradigm. Thus the application built by the SME is an arbitrary construct that may be specified/contracted to provision a target platform with a targeted application. Any change required in any of the content, format and/or function is available as a result of the specify/contract task already done and is provisioned with the required implementation managed by the framework.

Work and Rework in the traditional paradigm is expensive, requiring SME's to guide the designer and developer and requiring manual handling which is expensive, error-prone and redundant.

Work and Rework in the 6826744 paradigm is limited to SME changes managed and implemented by the framework.

THIS is the Unified Development Platform being created within Microsoft. The patent method must be translated into a hard product by each license buyer. This means the buyer of a patent license constructs a useful development architecture based on the buyer's philosophy and workforce requirements, then is able to create applications per that philosophy/workforce method.

This limits the buyer of a license to building per their traditional paradigm.

Any other buyer of a license may be a Subject Matter Expert with no development workforce. Such a license buyer then has the luxury of building per Vertical's experience and products short-circuiting the creation investment spent by the larger licensees. This will produce development products targeted to SME's of that original licensee's vertical discipline.

The wholesale 'application builder' thus has the task of building a market for each vertical discipline while the smaller VCSY licensee may get to that vertical discipline market much more quickly with much more precisely targeted capability.

This is the advantage of VCSY 'almost giving away' the SiteFlash('744/'629) patent which allows Vertical the luxury of selling that license to anyone for 'almost nothing' rather than being locked into a royalty per piecework regime within the large buyer. This spreads the VCSY patent capability to any and all vertical disciplines while the large 'software development' licensee must employ their workforce under the tutelage of SME's. Smaller is agile. Larger is behind

No doubt the smaller licensees will be 'there' much sooner than the larger licensees and will thus be occupying verticals with SME derived work before the giants are able to get their 'product' into the hands of vertical SME's. All's fair in war and licensing.







Here is one explanation that describes the Ecosystem that Vertical Computer Systems Inc. holds.

1) '744 makes any computing facility into "intelligent objects."
2) '629 permits an "intelligent language" in any computer facility.
3) '521 "translates objects into other objects."
4) '266 (Emily - MLE) "translates languages into other languages"



Another way to describe it...

1) SiteFlash patents('744/'629) cover ecosystems for application building and that covers all content management and applications for starters.
2) '521 (XML Enabler Agent) for building databases where there are no databases. '521 will play a large part in becoming ready-made components for use in building virtual computing system architecture.
3) Emily ('266) is a language transformation component which complements '521's machine virtualization component. Those two patents go hand in hand. It would be difficult to determine which one is more valuable.

----------------------------------------

As '744/'629 serve to provision applications and every document will be its own application, and as '521/'266(Emily) serve to provision virtual systems and every document will need to exist and transport using virtual components, since they are used in a connected say.
1) '744 encapsulates all prior computing art components (computing programs) as intelligent objects.
2) '629 encapsulates all prior computing executables (computing programs) as intelligent objects.
3) '521 enables for interoperation all data body structures and functions.
4) '266(Emily) translates all data body structure functions.


Therefore the Ecosystem:

1) Uses '744 (framework environment) to build applications out of computing components.
2) Uses '629 to build applications out of computing languages.
3) Uses '521 to build virtual machines.
4) Uses Emily (MLE Mobile Language Executive) to build virtual languages.
5) With the Tiny Web Server by Valdtaro, CTO of VCSY, used to ride closest to the hardware with items
1, 2, 3, 4 riding above.

So a full realization of distributed object computing where all traditional art is integrated into a seamless system. All computing on everything, everywhere becomes the new paradigm.



In current times, communications of all types are easily traceable. Companies often use commercials to portray certain messages . The Bill Gates Jerry Seinfeld commercials that aired only five weeks after the VCSY/Microsoft Confidential Settlement Agreement seem to contain interesting messages that align with speculations of longtime VCSY shareholders and reflect many of the timeline events listed herein. The skydiving commercial aired just after VCSY filed their lawsuit against Interwoven, Samsung and LG. VCSY's Very High Level Language is named "Emily". Please  notice that when the one skydiver thinks the other Is about to die, he asks if it's cool to date Emily, but quickly backs away from the request when the  parachute opens. Interesting play on words in all of the Microsoft commercials.

 

The EMILY PATENT is APPROVED !

This Site in not an Official Site of VCSY.
It is not endorsed by the company, its management or any of its officers or employees.
Information is provided solely to inform the readers of:
 current and past details of the company, its products, patents, and lay opinions about current/past litigation(s).

This website is designed to help inform and educate the readers of stated facts and opinions that are shared between many VCSY Long shareholders and some non-shareholders of VCSY. Some people think that at under two cents a share, VCSY is the investment of a lifetime and then there are others who spend all of their time trying to convince the readers that VCSY is nothing but a worthless patent troll with no real future. With that being said, good luck in your search for understanding. We ask that you do not NOT buy or sell VCSY stock on anything read from this website. 

The OFFICIAL COMPANY WEBSITE can be found at www.vcsy.com 

It's interesting how much time and energy certain messageboard posters have spent trying to convince others that VCSY's patents have little to no future value. All of the arguments against the VCSY 6,826,744 and 7,716,629 patents have been squashed.

*On December 30, 2011 Judge Seeborg ruled in favor of VCSY in the VCSY/Interwoven Markman Hearing. 

**On November 15, 2012 VCSY was issued reexamination certificates for the 6,826,744 and 7,716,629 patents by the USPTO.

***On January 4, 2013 Judge Seeborg denied Interwoven's motion for Summary Judgement

 

The history of VCSY goes back much further than where this brief 2006 timeline below begins. A more detailed timeline of dated events will be within the forum for you to view, if you register and are granted access beyond this point.


VCSY was granted the 7,076,521 patent on March 29, 2006. The first time we see XML mentioned as a functional programming language in patent history is in MLE/Emily 7,076,521 (separate from '744/'629 and issued later) which can then be turned toward building the '744/'629 framework using XML as a programming language - but not before.

So XML as a programming language is not used to achieve what '744/'629 claims. Therefore, a '744/'629 framework can be built in any programming language. It would be enhanced by then using MLE/Emily as an XML programming medium if necessary.

(opinion) If you are a longtime reader of the ragingbull messageboard, you might want to make a special note that tepe showed up on April 6, 2006 just one week after VCSY was granted that very powerful '521 patent. Since his arrival, tepe has been very dedicated in his efforts to harm any positive news, events or speculation that has been posted about VCSY. Tepe has been partnered with waterfoundonmars(aka - mirror, mrrrfk, kantuc, reflexxxshun, legofeeel and a few other aliases) from the very beginning. 


 
Here is a timeline of dated events:

On March 29, 2006
Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Receives a Notice of Allowance From The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office For a Patent Application Covering Various Aspects Of The XML Enabler Agent
http://www.vcsy.com/press/releases.php?year=2006&month=03&day=29&num=00


On June 06, 2006 
VCSY hired Niro on a contingency basis to act in connection with the licensing of VCSY's 6,826,744 patent

"Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. (VCSY) announced today that it has retained the law firm of Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro on a contingency basis to act in connection with the licensing of United States Patent (U.S) No. 6,826,744, the underlying Patent under VCSY's SiteFlash and SiteFlash-derived products."
http://www.vcsy.com/press/releases.php?year=2006&month=06&day=06&num=00


On April 18, 2007 
Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Files Patent Infringement Lawsuit Against Microsoft Corporation. Inducing infringement was also listed in the lawsuit.
"VCSY claims that the Microsoft .Net System infringes U.S. Patent No. 6,826,744."
http://www.vcsy.com/press/releases.php?year=2007&month=04&day=20&num=00

(This statement and link below is from the original VCSY lawsuit filing against Microsoft)
"Microsoft has also induced others to infringe and/or has contributorily infringed those claims of the 744 patent."
http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/files/library/verticalsuit.pdf


On July 24, 2008
VCSY and Microsoft entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement the day before the scheduled Markman Hearing.
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=6073043-957-4715&type=sect&TabIndex=2&companyid=70466&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d1099509


On March 25, 2010
VCSY received a continuation patent of the 6,826,744 patent that Microsoft and VCSY entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement over.
http://www.vcsy.com/press/releases.php?year=2010&month=03&day=25&num=00



On April 14, 2010 in VCSY's 2009 10-K VCSY's CEO Richard Wade stated;

"In July 2008, we settled an infringement claim we had initiated in federal court against Microsoft. We are waiting for the issuance of the Continuation Patent for U.S. Patent No. 6,826,744 (which SiteFlash is based upon) before we engage with new licensees because we believe the Continuation Patent provides better protection for this intellectual property asset."
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/DisplayFiling.aspx?TabIndex=2&FilingID=7186223&companyid=70466&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d1099509


One month after receiving the Continuation patent, Microsoft started moving forward in signing new licensing agreements with all of their partners and android licensing agreements with the Android crowd. Microsoft signed over 500 new licensing agreements since April of 2010. The two articles below show proof of the 500+ licenses signed during that period.


April 27, 2010 
Agreement will cover HTC's Android phones. 
"Since Microsoft launched its IP licensing program in December 2003, the company has entered into more than 600 licensing agreements"
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/press/2010/apr10/04-27MSHTCPR.aspx


April 25, 2012 
Microsoft and Pegatron Corp. Sign Patent Agreement Covering Android- and Chrome-Based Devices
"Since Microsoft launched its IP licensing program in December 2003, the company has entered into more than 1,100 licensing agreements"
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/news/Press/2012/Apr12/04-25PegatronPR.aspx

 

Microsoft obviously signed all of their partners to a new licensing agreement just after VCSY received the Continuation patent of the '744 which was the subject of the legal proceedings. So did VCSY and Microsoft entered into a beginning to end Confidential Settlement Agreement, meaning that all details are confidential from the beginning (July 24, 2008) to the end (???).


"Confidentiality procedures are often introduced in a "piecemeal" manner, leading to a lack of clarity and possible conflicts. To reduce the risk of leaks, implement acomprehensive and well-thoughtout set of procedures. They must be clear and easy to follow, and if properly implemented they will become integral parts of your business culture. While the most effective systems are designed from beginning to end by experts" (Amber Rovner?)
http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/41394/Information+Security+Risk+Management/Guard+Your+Confidential+Information

 
 

MONDAY, JUNE 14, 2010 
Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. Adopts Shareholder Rights Plan (aka - poison pill). 

(Press release) http://www.vcsy.com/press/releases.php?year=2010&month=06&day=14&num=00(8-K filing) 
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=7312380-1002-14088&type=sect&TabIndex=2&companyid=70466&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d1099509




Instructions - Create a poison pill

11 "Enter into a partnership with another company and include a large breakup fee in the agreement. A hostile acquiring company would then have to pay a significant fee to your partner when purchasing your firm."
http://www.ehow.com/how_138822_defend-against-hostile.html


MONDAY, JUNE 14, 2010 
Microsoft enters into $1.25 Credit Indenture 
http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=7321589-831-10252&type=sect&TabIndex=2&companyid=8528&ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fcik%253d789019





Now back tracking to January 12, 2009 
VCSY sent Interwoven a cease and desist letter claiming that Interwoven's TeamSite product infringes the same '744 patent that was the subject of the VCSY/Microsoft Confidential Settlement Agreement just six months earlier.

Autonomy then bought Interwoven just ten days later on January 22, 2009
http://www.cbronline.com/blogs/technology/autonomy_buys_i


By March of 2009 Autonomy CEO Mike Lynch had already completed the integration of Autonomy's IDOL with Interwoven's TeamSite product. The same TeamSite product that VCSY claims infringes the two VCSY patents('744 and '629)
http://www.autonomy.com/content/News/Releases/2009/0319.en.html


On November 15, 2010
VCSY filed lawsuits against Interwoven, Samsung and LG
Samsung and LG are accused of violating VCSY's 744 and 629 patents in their mobile devices.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/62017035/Vertical-Computer-Systems-v-Interwoven-et-al


On December 8, 2011
1. Hewlett Packard open-sourced WebOS
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397447,00.asp

2. Also on December 8, 2011 - Hewlett Packard and Microsoft entered into a four-year Cloud Computing licensing agreement 
http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2131510/microsoft-hp-team-offer-cloud-services


On December 14, 2011
The VCSY and Interwoven Markman Hearing was heard before Judge Seeborg

On December 30, 2011
Judge Seeborg sides with VCSY in Markman Hearing decision, telling Interwoven that the reexamination process would be a better option.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/3:2010cv04645/233008/83/
http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=HPQ&read=4376


On January 6, 2012
Interwoven files ExParte Reexamination request applications on the VCSY '744 AND '629 patents, claiming prior art issues.


On November 15, 2012
VCSY received the reexamination certificates for the two patents(6,826,744 & 7,716,629) that were challenged by Interwoven/Autonomy in the lawsuit where VCSY claims that Interwoven's TeamSite product infringes those two patents.


On November 20, 2012 (just days after VCSY received the reexamination certificates)
Hewlett Packard started screaming FRAUD against Autonomy.
http://news.yahoo.com/hewlett-packard-quarterly-revenue-falls-6-7-percent-123741296--finance.html


Obviously Autonomy's IDOL and other products are now worth much less money today than it was originally accessed at during their aquisition period, since the reexamination certificates issued to VCSY on November 15, 2012 now show that Autonomy's finacial numbers are based on infringing products.


On January 4, 2013 Judge Seeborg denied Interwovens motion for Summary Judgement.

Since then, Hewlett Packard has been showing that they are using VCSY's patent claims in IDOL10 and other Hewlett Packard/Autonomy products.

 

Hewlett Packard had written and dated a press release for Demember 18, 2012 but did not release it until January 10, 2013.

Hewlett-Packard expands service virtualization palette 
HP Service Virtualization 2.3 can now mimic JDBC databases and legacy TCP/IP applications
http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/hewlett-packard-expands-service-virtualization-palette-209462



By: moonpunk
10 Jan 2013, 06:47 PM CST 
Msg. 351121 of 351195 
(Reply to 351120 by KAATN) 

The fact is this:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/virtualization/hewlett-packard-expands-service-virtualization-palette-209462

can be diagrammed to show it's 744 being touted in HP.hp?action=register

 

February 11, 2013

Hewlett Packard fraud investigation period against Autonomy is from January of 2009 to June 30, 2011.
The fraud investigation starting at the same time that Autonomy bought Interwoven and not anytime before then.
http://www.komonews.com/news/business/UK-watchdog-launches-investigation-into-Autonomy-190693601.html